Can Anwar Ibrahim boost PKR's image?

It’s true that the images of the political party play a strong role in boosting up the support and the victory.

Typically, strong grass root level support, party machinery and media reporting are vital to boost party’s ratings.

Often than not, political opponents are critical and post as the major hindrance to boosting party image. In order to boost the party's image, PKR was urged to be more courageous and be determined in the perception of the public.

In reality, PKR seems got nothing to be boosted. The defection of 10 of its parliamentarians and state assembly representative is the worst thing that has ever happened in the political history of Malaysia. It clearly serves as the evidence of an increasing degree of unacceptable behavior in the party.

The defection has long been criticized and PKR need to be prepared for the worst political wave.

Politically, major party defection is extremely rare and the defection took PKR by surprise. It was a crushing setback for opposition parties, instantly reducing what limited power opposition has in the Dewan Rakyat.

The ability of the opposition to stop legislation or to block BN agenda is now crippled if not eliminated in some instances. Although the political circumstances are different today, yet it dealt a damaging blow to PKR. And how many defections have we seen in the other direction remained questionable.

It apparently frees people up to say what they really believe the relevancy of the PKR elected parliamentarians and state assembly representative.

The political climate seems more unfavorable for PKR and the opposition leader's popularity won't be remain instead fall dramatically. Several studies have implicated that PKR do not have any takeover opportunity in the Dewan Rakyat.

It was skeptical of the urgency of the defection of the PKR parliamentarians and state assembly representative problem. After all, there is some precedence for PKR changing their minds. There need to wonder how many more PKR leaders will be outing themselves as skeptics?

They may never constitute a majority, and many of them have differing views emanating from contrasting political ideologies in PKR, it only takes few of them to be right for the deflection for PKR to collapse.

The question therefore is not whether Anwar Ibrahim will retain as the Opposition Leader and PKR de facto head.

The critical question is whether the PKR elite in which the post of Opposition Leader and PKR de facto head is determined still fighting to retain much of their political struggle and how to overcome the political defection.

Anwar is responsible for the collapse of Pakatan Rakyat

Parti Keadilan Rakyat advisor Anwar Ibrahim has been forced to apologise for his wrong choice of candidates in the 2008 general election.

The emergence of his apology can be understood in the political context of recent longstanding tensions in the Pakatan Rakyat.

Interestingly, the incidence seems would explain why to date there has been so many overt and covert criticism of his leadership either within the country or internationally.

This unleashed an ongoing yet remarkably silent controversy and internal crisis around the leadership in Pakatan Rakyat.

It witnessed the emergence of another kind of war that PKR is struggling within the opposition pact, namely Malay dominated PAS and Chinese-based DAP.

Ironically, politics are structured along explicit ethnic’s lines and political differences have always been a feature of the Malaysian community.

It was claimed by the analyst that the central political reality of Malaysia has been the ethnic cleavage between Malays and non-Malays which opposition is being seen as weak and unable to handle.

By choosing shaky and unclean candidates which stabbed him in the back, it is giving fodder that the opposition is on the verge of collapse.

The questions arise: When will opposition coalition collapse happen? Will the opposition leaders sit by and let it happen?

Guan Eng is unhappy with Anwar Ibrahim

Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had proof that he has no credibility and was only out to create trouble. He is just play-acting.

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim

Ironically, the resignation of Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin as Chief Minister I and state assemblyman for Penanti showed that Anwar is a leader with no credibility.

His actions had brought nothing but problems to the opposition coalition, people and country.

The question arises: Is it the time has come for the people to no longer pay attention to what Anwar had to say as it was only a waste of time?


Lim Guan Eng

Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has admitted that he is unhappy with the events surrounding the resignation of Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin as Chief Minister I and state assemblyman for Penanti.

He said, for the sake of solidarity in the coalition he left it to Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR)’s advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to resolve the matter.

He is less than happy with the developments but there is a vacancy for the seat of Penanti and so there has to be a by-election.”

“Regarding the by-election, ask Anwar ...we will proceed with this matter if Anwar has proposals,” he said.

On Anwar’s decision to perhaps pick the new Penanti state assemblyman as Chief Minister I, Lim said: “We are just waiting for a suggestion from him...I have given him time to do so.

“To avoid more speculation, it is better to leave it to Anwar to answer all questions. There are a lot of rumors that the existing state assemblymen are not qualified to fill the position of Chief Minister I.”

Bukit Gantang : Anwar Ibrahim, Nizar and Ngeh have different dreams

Everyone has a dream and is destined to fulfill them but not Anwar Ibrahim, Nizar Jamaluddin and Ngeh Koo Ham. They have different dreams while on the same bed.

The Chinese proverb says, "We may sleep in the same bed, but have different dreams.

Ironically, it is a reality that even the closest people, husband and wife, will dream different dreams.

By far, Nizar is the one horse who needs to work more than any of the others in Bukit Gantang.

Although Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin is focusing on Pakatan Rakyat’s agenda of establishing a welfare state but it is not discarding its agenda to set up an Islamic state.

It is important to bear in mind that all this while Ngeh Koo Ham fought more for Malaysian Malaysia.

Although the Anwar Ibrahim's ideology is commonly described as “multiracialism”, it would be more accurate to describe it as a form of pluralism that still requires Malay leadership.He is dreaming to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

The opposition coalition only paid lip service, they could talk and criticize but unable to deliver what they promised.They faces many problems and never alike in their minds. They got to be wary of even the coalition they trust the most.

The impossible opposition coalition dream can not possibly be realized even they try the radical political approach and wary among themselves.

The question remains: Can we trust the coalition politicians that they don't even trust themselves?

Fairus quits as Penang Deputy Chief Minister ails opposition alliance

Penang Deputy Chief Minister I Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin has resigned effective April 8. He also quit his position as state executive councilor.

It was reported that his resignation is due to the state PKR’s internal investigations into allegations that two of their leaders were involved in illegal activities with quarry operators.

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim

However, De factor PKR leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim told reporters that Fairus, who has two Masters Degrees, had received offers for further studies and planned to take up one of those offers.

The resignation of Penang Deputy Chief Minister I Fairus Khairuddin is one of the latest embarrassments which have threatened the existence of opposition alliance.

Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin

It was reported that Fairus was known to have under allegations of under-performance, clashes with other PKR members and most recently, misuse of power. He enjoyed the trappings of power but did very little work as Penang state Deputy Chief Minister. He was frequently absent from state executive council meetings and had little to contribute. He hardly turned up at his constituency to serve the voters.

Ironically, of all the major problems faced by the Pakatan Rakyat since its formation last year, Parti Keadilan Rakyat would stand out as the source of much that ails the opposition alliance.

The scandals have seen PR lose the momentum it had gained against the ruling Barisan Nasional since last year’s March 8 general election.

From being on the cusp of power, the PR alliance is now faced with the growing pains it cannot afford if it is to have any chance of being a serious and viable alternative to BN.

It is crystal clear that PKR is the source of most of PR’s problems. It is the major challenges which threaten to derail a stunning political comeback by Anwar, who was sacked as deputy premier in 1998 under Mahathir and jailed on sodomy and corruption allegations that he said were politically motivated.

The above scenario clearly shown Anwar’s inability and he is not fit to lead the Pakatan Rakyat.

The question remains: Do we still want to support Pakatan Rakyat lead by Anwar or otherwise?

When will the Pakatan Rakyat collapse?

Political crisis spark off in the Pakatan Rakyat with DAP chairman Karpal Singh calling on Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to step down as head of the alliance.

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim

Blaming Anwar, also PKR advisor and de facto leader, for creating trouble in the opposition alliance, he said Pakatan needed a new leader.

“He (Anwar) has created enough trouble and it is time for him to bertaubat (repent). I wonder if he is fit to be the leader of Pakatan Rakyat. In fact I think Pakatan Rakyat requires another leader, a good leader. Not someone who believes in immorality, even accepting crossovers," he said.

“It’s time Pakatan got itself another leader,” he told a press conference at his office.

Karpal Singh said members of PKR and DAP had fallen sway to the rhetoric of Anwar, who had supported the cross-over of elected representatives.

Karpal Singh

Karpal also warned his party leaders not to push him too far. "I have been patient all this while. Don't let matters come to a head in the interest of Pakatan Rakyat and also DAP. In fact, I have even proposed that DAP leave Pakatan Rakyat on the issue of hudud law but no one supported me, neither Kit Siang nor Guan Eng. It is a shame and they should also bertaubat (repent).

"Anwar is widely credited with knitting the different parties in Pakatan -- PKR, DAP and PAS -- into the coherent opposition that swept five states from under Barisan Nasional’s feet in the 12th general election last March.

The questions remain: Who will the Pakatan Rakyat take down and when will the Pakatan Rakyat collapse?

Putrajaya 100,000 km

Karpal lashed out at Anwar over hudud law

Although both internal and external factors were responsible for the slow-brewing but hudud law was claimed has been the most prominent factor that brought the current internal crisis in Pakatan Rakyat.Undeniably, it’s crystal clear that PR alliance did not have any common policy and stand on issues. It is a very loose coalition and was only held together by targeting of toppling the BN government.

Ironically, a promised day of sunshine would often bring pouring rain. From all indications, Anwar Ibarhim’s failure of leadership seems to be the primarily factor that caused Karpal Singh lashed out at him.


It is reported that DAP national chairman Karpal Singh has lashed out at PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim by saying that his assertion that hudud laws apply only to Muslims is a fallacy.

Karpal Singh said Anwar’s statement that there was no need to reject hudud law as it was only applicable to Muslims was diametrically opposed to PAS’ avowed aim to turn Malaysia into an Islamic state. Islamic state has been PAS’ stand from its inception as is clearly reflected by the statements by former and present leaders of PAS.

He noted PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat was quoted late last month as saying: “I cannot see why they (non-Muslims) cannot accept hudud laws which are no different from the colonial laws of the West”.

Karpal Singh said for hudud laws to be applicable, the prerequisite would be the setting up of an Islamic state where Islamic laws were applicable to both Muslims and non-Muslims.

“It is important for Anwar to know exactly what PAS intends to do in calling for the setting up of an Islamic state. Perhaps PAS president Hadi Awang should clear the air as to whether hudud laws intended by PAS are applicable to both Muslims and non-Muslims in the event PAS succeeds in setting up an Islamic state.”

Continuous tension brewing within Pakatan Rakyat

In moments when variegated political forces are pitted against each other, certain individuals come to play pivotal roles.

Anwar Ibrahim is the orthodoxy iconic which has the outstanding ability to influence as well as motivate the supporters. But can he strengthening the loose cooperation in the Pakatan Rakyat not only remain questionable but the actual answer is waiting by political analysts.


Ironically, a single symbol is very important for the party’s identity as well as the candidates of the coalition parties in contesting the polls. Without a common symbol, each candidate will have to contest on their own separate symbol.

It is very important distinction between the coalition and the rival faction, all of this has made it extremely confusing that there isn't a single symbol. Look at history as a proof, the successful political coalition only had a single symbol.




Pakatan Rakyat without the single symbol seem to be divided and can be considered as loose cooperation between PKR, DAP and PAS. Politically, in order to demand for political benefit and achieve the common interest to topper political rival Barisan Nasional, DAP and PKR are forced to ally with PAS.

It’s well known fact that DAP and PAS have been in loggerheads over their respective stand on both the formation of Islamic state and hudud laws.

In the eye of the Malaysian Chinese community, PAS are religiously fundamentalist, extremist and racist, and in many ways at loggerheads with the values upheld by Pakatan Rakyat especially DAP.

A strong believes and fears that with extreme measures such as enacting Islamic “hudud” laws, a vote for PAS may cause the Chinese to be suffered.

There has been discomfort over the re-emergence of the conservative faction of Pas in advocating the control of alcohol sales and the implementation of hudud laws.

The recent conflict and infighting concerning the Klang central bus station, local elections of village chiefs in Perak and the speculation surrounding the non-appointment as Ipoh mayor or deputy mayor of DAP's Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran just like pours oil in the fire.

These issues are especially significant and we could see continuous tension brewing within Pakatan Rakyat coalition especially between PAS and DAP just 10 months after the general election.

Would you support a problematic political coalition party that acknowledged internal conflict as a problem threatening them?

Makkal Sakti prove challenging Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan Rakyat

It wouldn't surprise me a bit politically if this is the Makkal Sakti fever prove challenging Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan Rakyat which might cause Anwar Ibrahim to start sinking.


Ironically, it is crystal clear that the exploited disappointment felt by the Indians, who claim that they face discrimination and marginalization by leaders of PKR, DAP and PAS might cause Anwar Ibrahim’s vessel to start sinking.


In order to demand for political benefit and achieve self-interest, politicians will act in such a way as to maximize and achieve their self-interest.

It is reported that Kapar parliamentarian S. Manikavasagam has quit his Selangor PKR deputy liaison chief post following his fallout with Selangor Mentri Besar Khalid Ibrahim and growing frustrations with the party leadership.

Manikavasagam will nevertheless remain in the party supreme council until after his meeting with PKR chieftain Anwar Ibrahim, who is currently overseas.

Manikavasagam said he would be attending the Pravasi Bharatiya Divas convention on Jan 5 in India. While in India, he is also expected to meet Hindraf leader P. Waythamoorthy, who is in self-imposed exile in United Kingdom.

Manikavasagam said he would consult Anwar on his political future when he returns to Malaysia on Jan 15.

Consequently, it is also reported that the discontent is boiling over among the Indian members of Pakatan Rakyat parties. Among the exploited issues that claimed the Indian members of PKR are unhappy over are the appointments to posts like local councilors, government-linked companies and village committees.

Some 50 Indian leaders from the Pakatan were going to meet to come up with a united stand on whether to stay or leave component parties following Kapar Member of Parliament S. Manikavasagam decision to quit PKR. The move implies that Pakatan Rakyat alliance seriously required taking the pledge of loyalty.

By and large, the loyalties of Indian leaders in the Pakatan Rakyat to Anwar Ibrahim thus remain questionable.

Is Anwar Ibrahim a sinking politician?

PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim announced that he would be the chairman of the Sabah and Sarawak PKR liaison committees to wrest the two states from the Barisan Nasional, especially with Sarawak facing a state election by 2011.

Anwar Ibrahim

The announcement strongly indicated that he is using his position at the central level to control the PKR activities in the two states. It also shows that he has no confidence in the PKR leaders in both states especially Dominique Ng to lead the Sarawak PKR.

Dominique Ng

Ironically, to be truly the great political leader is to have quality of political influence and confidence in local leaders.

Look at history as a proof, the successful political leader must be well versed in getting support from the grassroots leaders in order to be successful in politics. He must have the outstanding ability to influence as well as motivate the supporters.

Undeniably, politics is a numbers game. The lack of political confidence as well as the support for the states leaders thus shows that Anwar’s failure as a political leader.

The question remains: Is Anwar Ibrahim a sinking politician?

Another Pakatan Rakyat’s empty boast over transfer of power

The date set for a Pakatan Rakyat takeover, Sept 16 had come and gone with the BN still firmly in control of the government. The BN government is likely to grow even stronger before it’s predicted.

It is unacceptable that the undemocratic transfer of power was allowed to happen.

Parti Keadilan Rakyat has yet again falsely claimed that talks were being held with the Barisan Nasional on a transfer of power. It is the latest baseless strategy to twist and empty boast over transfer of power.

Although Pakatan Rakyat claimed that the opposition coalition having enough defections to topple the government and negotiations had begun with the ruling coalition over a transfer of power, however, not even a single defector has come forward.

Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi yesterday scoffed at a Parti Keadilan Rakyat claim that talks were being held with the Barisan Nasional on a transfer of power.

The prime minister, who is BN chairman and Umno president, also described PKR information chief Tian Chua's claim that contacts had been made between intermediaries of the two sides as "the craziest report I have ever heard".

While Abdullah had denied this, Pakatan Rakyat supremo Anwar Ibrahim also appeared to be in the dark about the negotiations.

"I'm not aware of any negotiations taking place between Pakatan Rakyat and the prime minister - statements made yesterday suggesting that a line of communication was open were misinformed," said the opposition leader in a statement.

Anwar added: "No, not that I'm aware of… he (Tian) may be privy to other information but as far as I'm concerned what the PM said was right.

"Very rarely do I agree with Abdullah Badawi."

Anwar's strategic bluff

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim claimed that today September 16 the opposition coalition was poised to take over the Federal Government is merely a strategic political bluff.


Anwar chose Sept 16 as the day to form the government is a strategic political move as it is the day Malaysia was formed. It aimed at convincing parties in both Sabah and Sarawak to cross over. They were promised to be given more power and more respect under a Pakatan-led government but unfortunately he failed to do so.

We believe the grand strategy to attract BN parliamentary members to cross over is a remarkably astute political move by Anwar. If he has enough members of parliament, why does he not form the government as claimed for?

Could this be an audacious bluff? Ironically, it clearly shown the application of “Moke Theory” to condition and attract the members of parliament to cross over for fear of being left behind.

Initially, Anwar was reported as approaching one of the ruling parties in Sarawak and saying that he already had 20 MPs from Sabah. Those in Sarawak will be left out if they do not cross over and vice versa in Sabah. Now he is claiming that more than 31 Barisan MPs will cross over to Pakatan Rakyat.

The ruling party UMNO in Sabah currently holds 32 out of 60 state seats and PBB in Sarawak currently holds 35 out of 71 state seats. As far as they are concern, they are staunchly pro-BN.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi laughed off opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's claims that he had enough numbers to form the Government and that he would only show the list of crossovers from the Barisan Nasional to Abdullah with whom he is seeking a meeting.

"He would not have requested to see me. He would have just barged into my office with his MPs and supporters," Abdullah said.